<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All opposed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/</link>
	<description>Very helpful!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: entirely safe and fun &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bob Ney said something smart!</title>
		<link>http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/#comment-3699</link>
		<dc:creator>entirely safe and fun &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bob Ney said something smart!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/#comment-3699</guid>
		<description>[...] CNN, reporting on disgraced former Ohio Congressthing Bob Ney, carried this poetically economical confession in their story on Ney&#8217;s recent sentencing (30 months, which I believe is probably not enough to deter his former colleagues, given the rewards to be reaped from corruption at that level). In a previous post, I said that Ney&#8217;s &#8220;But I&#8217;m an alcoholic!&#8221; defense was thin cover, and that the real root of corruption was hubris — his belief that, as a protected incumbent, he was beyond the reach of the law. The story can now be amended a bit to say that he was within the reach of the law, but the law&#8217;s grip was not strong enough to really hurt him. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] CNN, reporting on disgraced former Ohio Congressthing Bob Ney, carried this poetically economical confession in their story on Ney&#8217;s recent sentencing (30 months, which I believe is probably not enough to deter his former colleagues, given the rewards to be reaped from corruption at that level). In a previous post, I said that Ney&#8217;s &#8220;But I&#8217;m an alcoholic!&#8221; defense was thin cover, and that the real root of corruption was hubris — his belief that, as a protected incumbent, he was beyond the reach of the law. The story can now be amended a bit to say that he was within the reach of the law, but the law&#8217;s grip was not strong enough to really hurt him. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>People don't believe in rights that are either inherent or inalienable anymore.  What the masses believe and what they want are privileges granted to them by their benign protector government.  Doing all the work so they don't have to and all the thinking because they no longer can.

Sad state of affairs our affairs of state are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People don&#8217;t believe in rights that are either inherent or inalienable anymore.  What the masses believe and what they want are privileges granted to them by their benign protector government.  Doing all the work so they don&#8217;t have to and all the thinking because they no longer can.</p>
<p>Sad state of affairs our affairs of state are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>I've never been clear on why McCain-Feingold isn't viewed for what it is: the second-worst piece of legislation (just after USA "PATRIOT") of the last ten years, in terms of damage not just to the Constitution but also to the principles of liberal democracy.  It's not clear to me it would survive a 1A challenge before the Supreme Court, and I wonder what it would take to get one of the radio personalities (e.g.) &lt;a href="http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2005/07/judicial-ruling-could-silence-talk.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;recently targeted&lt;/a&gt; under it to run up the black flag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never been clear on why McCain-Feingold isn&#8217;t viewed for what it is: the second-worst piece of legislation (just after USA &#8220;PATRIOT&#8221;) of the last ten years, in terms of damage not just to the Constitution but also to the principles of liberal democracy.  It&#8217;s not clear to me it would survive a 1A challenge before the Supreme Court, and I wonder what it would take to get one of the radio personalities (e.g.) <a href="http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2005/07/judicial-ruling-could-silence-talk.html" rel="nofollow">recently targeted</a> under it to run up the black flag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entirelysafeandfun.com/wp/2006/10/13/all-opposed/#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>Incumbency is the devil of politics.  The McCain-Feingold incumbent protection plan has spiked incumbency rates to what..98% or so?  I think Locke summed up how I feel about politicians "I have no reason to suppose that he, who would take away my Liberty, would not when he had me in his Power, take away everything else."

*hugs mr man*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incumbency is the devil of politics.  The McCain-Feingold incumbent protection plan has spiked incumbency rates to what..98% or so?  I think Locke summed up how I feel about politicians &#8220;I have no reason to suppose that he, who would take away my Liberty, would not when he had me in his Power, take away everything else.&#8221;</p>
<p>*hugs mr man*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
